I was
invited to the Black Sea Region NGO Forum that took place in Kiev, Ukraine,
8-10 December 2014, as coordinator of the Spanish chapter of Women in
International Security, (SWIIS) and to give voice to WIIS Belgium who could not
attend the Forum.
The Forum main objective was to debate on the essential role of CSO s in the region at a time of great and common challenges, but also opportunities, in the countries invited and represented by NGOs from Romania, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia, Moldova, Albania, Bulgaria and Ukraine. The conference looked into three dimensions:
This type of forums helps to create networking, reinforces the legitimacy of CSOs and the multiplier effect of their work. Some common spaces of the different countries were also mentioned, as global trends, such as, restrictions to foreign funding, difficulties for some NGOs to register and restriction to freedom of expression (Azerbaijan, Russia and Turkey).
https://www.facebook.com/BlackSeaNGOForum?pnref=story
It was the
first meeting of the Forum that took place outside Romania, country that has
coordinated the Forum since its creation in 2007. Romanian FOND is a platform
of 36 Romanian NGOs working for international development and is an active
member of the European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development (CONCORD).
This year´s
Forum: “Enabling Environment for CSOs: Towards a Strategy of Civil Society in
the Black Sea Region” was organized with
the financial support and active participation of the European Commission, the
CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness (CPDE) and local support of the
Ukrainian Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum among others.
The Forum main objective was to debate on the essential role of CSO s in the region at a time of great and common challenges, but also opportunities, in the countries invited and represented by NGOs from Romania, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia, Moldova, Albania, Bulgaria and Ukraine. The conference looked into three dimensions:
1. Universally accepted human rights
and freedoms affecting CSOs
2. Policy influencing
3. Donor – CSO relationships
The 3 day
encounter was very well organized with different panels, some as plenaries with
speakers from EU External Action and the European Commission, CONCORD, CPDE and
many other CSO initiatives and platforms.
All of them, aiming to create a Strategy of Civil Society in the Black
Sea Region. Several workshops were also structured where we could work in
smaller groups on this issue and also in thematic issues such as Democracy and
Human Rights, Local Development, Child Protection, Social Economy and
others. As Coordinator of SWIIS, I
missed, however, the gender perspective in the thematic workshops. One last interesting panel dealt with Donor
involvement in the region; mainly EU, EBRD and EED, but also larger NGOs from
EU countries and US.
In Busan it
was agreed that CSOs be Independent Development Partners, and the Forum tried
to work as a follow up to the CSO work.This type of forums helps to create networking, reinforces the legitimacy of CSOs and the multiplier effect of their work. Some common spaces of the different countries were also mentioned, as global trends, such as, restrictions to foreign funding, difficulties for some NGOs to register and restriction to freedom of expression (Azerbaijan, Russia and Turkey).
Important
to develop and share best practices and lessons learned and a feedback
mechanism, the analysis of the CSOs is done by the EU Delegation in each
country, where EU priorities are also taken into account. With this input roadmaps for different
countries are created. The challenges
are based on the lack of institutional capacity of some of these NGOs,
questions to their advocacy work, unwillingness of governments to work with
NGOs (when they do, their independency is questioned), policy influencing and
financial sustainability. Another main issue mentioned is the culture of
democracy, not enough in some of these countries to take on a serious
role. One barrier stated related to
receiving foreign funding is the poor use of English language, when projects
mainly have to be presented in English; another is the conflicts in some
countries.
Civil
society has to be seen not just as a player, but as an asset. If we secure the
enabling environment for civil society, we will have achieved our goal. I
brought back home many different ideas: the work of CSOs in peace building and
monitoring, CSOs as watchdogs, service providers and agencies that are closer
to those most vulnerable. Many cross border programs are in place in the region and working
safely. Needs and challenges were discussed in all parallel groups, as well as the
role of CSOs in confronting those challenges. As a conclusion and future follow up, the need
to enhance cooperation and democratic institutions building was identified.https://www.facebook.com/BlackSeaNGOForum?pnref=story
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario